Skip to main content

Russian Probe


On the CNN Russian probe video, the person who broke the stories on the stories what wanted to get the point across that the former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos knows that the Russians have “dirt on trump’s opponent Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Presidential Race. The CNN report of the story used the credit ability of CNN as a trust news sources which is ethos because most people will watch news that tells the true. She had a very calm, steady, clear voices as she delivers the information this is example Pathos because she makes you feel like a friend who is giving you some bad news. As you watch the video you isn’t just tell new she is giving support detail on how they know that a former Trump campaign adviser knew about Russian meddling in the 2016 Presidential  Election through trust resources. 
In the insider fox with Tomi Lahren, she wanted to get her point across that this Russian probe is a big waste of time. She is on fox news; which has a strong base for the conservative stand point. As she is speaking she has a very aggressive tone of voice, which she is using to get her audition as mad as she is over tax payers money going to this fake investigate in the Russian Probe” in her opinion.  She doesn’t really have any logical facts truly behind her argument she is just expressing emotion and frustration. 
When MSN broke the story about a former Trump Campaign adviser many could believe because MSN had been a credit news sources for years. The first report has a calm voice and speaks clear and explain in detail on how they came about on gather the information on the story. 
During the fox new interview with the white house press secretary, she had a bad reputation of not knowing what’s going on this shows with how weak her persuasion skills are. The way she was back tracking herself when question about trump view point, she answered major the question with a very broad answer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Four Pillars of Argument

The Thesis statement of the essay “College Is a Waste of Time” by Dale Stephens is the sentence College is expensive in paragraph 4. The author supported his thesis with evidence in the same paragraph. The evidence he used in that same paragraph was stating that the College Board Policy Center found that the cost of college university tuition is about 3.6 times higher than it was 30 years ago. In Paragraph 5, the author stated that are alternatives to college and people shouldn’t depend on college and he is starting a social movement called “UnCollege”. The refutation the author used was stating that a major function of college is that it is a way potential employers that one is qualified to work; supporting that evidence like Employers are recruiting off social media and work sites. Finally, the concluding statement the author stated was “We who take our education outside and beyond the classroom understand how actions build a better world. We will change the world regardless of the l...

About Me

Hello my name is Joe Sanders and I’m a Georgia Gwinnett College student. My major is Business Administration. I’m a cool and chill person. My hobbies are playing sports, and video games in my spare time. Some of my interests are getting good grades in college, spending time with friends and family, and listening to music. My friends say I can make anyone laugh so I guess I have an interest in comedy. My expectations for 2018 is to get all A’s in my classes and hopefully earn some scholarship and hopefully go on to                                                                  losing all my college debt and graduate with multiple degrees.

Final Response

Student presentations were excellent in my opinion. I liked a lot of the visuals in the power-points. Everyone seemed to have great knowledge of what they wanted to do or where they were going on their presentations. However, some students did not have a very clear thesis on their presentation and our professor said you need to make sure our thesis were clear because that is what your defending or going against as known as your claim. Some students also didn't have clear central ideas and had to be told that you got have great central ideas because it is a five page paper were writing. My topic in my presentation was Youth Sports. In my presentation, I felt it was good, but I have to make sure my central ideas are clear, so I can even gather up the information to support my claim. In order to improve my presentation I will go back and make sure that my central ideas are clear and good enough to support my claim.